Teaching Theory: A Multilevel Framework For Systematic And Engaged Learning And Teaching Processes And Successful Outcomes
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to present teaching theory, its three components- assumptions, concepts, and propositions, and its application in higher education classrooms. A post-test evaluation design was used to assess the effectiveness of teaching theory. Qualitative data were collected through a classroom survey from undergraduate and graduate level classes including online and seated classes to investigate the application of teaching theory. The results showed that learning and teaching outcomes were improved when learning and teaching were implemented at three different engagement levels (i.e., learner level, peer level and classroom level). Students and teachers’ engagement increased when teaching theory was operationalized and implemented in classrooms. Additionally, it was essential to consider and implement developmental, sociocultural and need-based contexts to foster learning and teaching at the three engagement levels of teaching theory. Students and teachers’ proactiveness, sensitivity and responsiveness were important factors in carrying out a successful learning and teaching process. In sum, teaching theory substantially improved learning and teaching outcomes in higher education classrooms. Teaching theory facilitates students and teachers in all types of classrooms at all educational levels and with all groups of the population for achieving positive educational outcomes.
References
1. Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Flipped classrooms to enhance postgraduate students’ research skills in preparing a research proposal.
2. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(4), 392-402.
3. Amoako Kayser, A. A., Darling-Aduana, J., Harris, J., Edwards, C., & Alridge, D. (2024). Virtual connections: Teacher beliefs and practices enacting culturally relevant practices in a virtual freedom school. The Urban Review, 56(2), 285-312.
4. Author, M. H. (2024a). The components of multilevel engagement theory. Canadian Journal of Family and Youth, 16(3), 38-56. Author, M. H. (2024b). The functions of the multilevel engagement theory. Scottish Journal of Residential Child Care: An
5. International Journal of Group and Family Care Experience, 23(1), 79-106.
6. Author, M. H. (2024c). The multilevel community engagement model: School, community, workplace engagement and service-learning.
7. United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing.
8. Autret, M., Bermea, A., Bible, J., Matera, K., & van Eeden-Moorefield, B. (2024). Implementing a flipped classroom approach in an introductory family science course. Family Science Review, 28(1), n1.
9. Baize, J. (2023). When school wasn’t “school”: Developing culturally responsive practice during the COVID-19 lockdowns.
10. Education Sciences, 13(7), 684.
11. Bell, H. (2018). Creative interventions for teaching empathy in the counseling classroom. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 13(1), 106-120.
12. Bunt, B. J., Grosser, M., & van Tonder, D. (2022). A novel proposal to use thinking maps to embed blooms’ taxonomy within teaching, learning, and assessment. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 21(2), 80-99.
13. Chen, C.-C., Lim, S., & Clardy, G. (2024). Qualitative exploration of the physical activity engagement among college students with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 70(8), 1367-1376.
14. Cheng, C.-C., & Yang, Y.-T. C. (2023). Impact of smart classrooms combined with student-centered pedagogies on rural
15. students’ learning outcomes: Pedagogy and duration as moderator variables. Computers & Education, 207, 104911.
16. Chou, C. L., Hung, M. L., Tsai, C. W., & Chang, Y. C. (2020). Developing and validating a scale for measuring teachers’
17. readiness for flipped classrooms in junior high schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1420-1435.
18. Cooper, M. M., Caballero, M. D., Carmel, J. H., Duffy, E. M., Ebert-May, D., Fata-Hartley, C. L., . . . Posey, L. A. (2024). Beyond active learning: Using 3-Dimensional learning to create scientifically authentic, student-centered classrooms. Plos One, 19(5), e0295887.
19. Costa, N. T., de Almeida, D. J., Oliveira, G. P., & Fernandes, M. A. (2022). Customized pedagogical recommendation using automated planning for sequencing based on Bloom’s taxonomy. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 20(1), 1-19.
20. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
21. Debnam, K. J., Smith, L. H., Aguayo, D., Reinke, W. M., & Herman, K. C. (2023). Nominated exemplar teacher perceptions of culturally responsive practices in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125, 104062.
22. Deo, S., Hinchcliff, M., Thai, N. T., Papakosmas, M., Chad, P., Heffernan, T., & Gibbons, B. (2024). Educating for the sustainable future: A conceptual process for mapping the United Nations sustainable development goals in marketing teaching using Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of Marketing Education, 46(2), 84-96.
23. Dorn‐Medeiros, C. M., Christensen, J. K., Lértora, I. M., & Croffie, A. L. (2020). Relational strategies for teaching multicultural courses in counselor education. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 48(3), 149-160.
24. Evans, C. M. (2023). Applying a culturally responsive pedagogical framework to design and evaluate classroom performance-
25. based assessments in Hawai ‘i. Applied Measurement in Education, 36(3), 269-285.
26. Fitzpatrick, K. R. (2022). Finding the other half of me”: Culture-based approaches to music education in Hawaiʻi. Journal of Research in Music Education, 70(1), 22-47.
27. Fleck, B., & Richmond, A. S. (2024). Does the instructors gender identity and syllabus design affect students perceptions of their instructor? Teaching of Psychology, 51(2), 166-179.
28. Fung, C. H., Poon, K. K., Besser, M., & Fung, M. C. (2024). Improving short‐term academic performance in the flipped classroom using dynamic geometry software. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(2), 775-786.
29. Herrmann-Werner, A., Festl-Wietek, T., Holderried, F., Herschbach, L., Griewatz, J., Masters, K., . . . Mahling, M. (2024). Assessing ChatGPT’s mastery of Bloom’s taxonomy using psychosomatic medicine exam questions: Mixed-methods study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e52113.
30. Hu, B. Y., Wang, S., Song, Y., & LoCasale-Crouch, J. (2020). Exploring the complex relationship between developmentally appropriate activities and teacher-child interaction quality in rural Chinese preschools. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105112.
31. Huang, K.-J. (2024). Evaluating GPT-4's cognitive functions through the Bloom taxonomy: Insights and clarifications. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e56997.
32. Hui, E. S. Y. E. (2024). Incorporating Bloom’s taxonomy into promoting cognitive thinking mechanism in artificial intelligence- supported learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-14.
33. Kim, S. J., & Hachey, A. C. (2021). Engaging preschoolers with critical literacy through counter-storytelling: A qualitative case study. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49, 633-646.
34. Knapp, M. S. (2009). Curriculum and instruction: A critical and reflective approach to teaching theory. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 743-750.
35. Kong, S.-C., & Wang, Y.-Q. (2024). The impact of school support for professional development on teachers' adoption of student- centered pedagogy, students’ cognitive learning and abilities: A three-level analysis. Computers & Education, 215, 105016.
36. Lai, H.-M., Hsieh, P.-J., Uden, L., & Yang, C.-H. (2021). A multilevel investigation of factors influencing university students’
37. behavioral engagement in flipped classrooms. Computers & Education, 175, 104318.
38. LePeau, L., Silberstein, S., Sharp, S., Miller, D., & Manlove, J. (2022). Validation of the term ‘cultural community’in the culturally engaging campus environments survey. Education Sciences, 12(12), 881.
39. Levlin, M., Wiklund-Hörnqvist, C., Sandgren, O., Karlsson, S., & Jonsson, B. (2022). Evaluating the effect of rich vocabulary instruction and retrieval practice on the classroom vocabulary skills of children with (developmental) language disorder. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 53(2), 542-560.
40. Li, H. H., Zhang, L. J., & Parr, J. M. (2020). Small-group student talk before individual writing in tertiary English writing classrooms in China: Nature and insights. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 570565.
41. Lin, T. J., Kraatz, E., Ha, S. Y., Hsieh, M. Y., Glassman, M., Nagpal, M., . . . Shin, S. (2022). Shaping classroom social experiences through collaborative small‐group discussions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 131-154.
42. Lyrio, B., Nada, C., & França, T. (2023). Dealing with diverse cultures and needs: How have higher education institutions in
43. Portugal responded to COVID-19? Education Sciences, 13(6), 585.
44. McGuire, P., Himot, B., Clayton, G., Yoo, M., & Logue, M. E. (2021). Booked on math: Developing math concepts in pre-k classrooms using interactive read-alouds. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49, 313-323.
45. Nelson, J. R., Hall, B. S., Anderson, J. L., Birtles, C., & Hemming, L. (2018). Self–compassion as self-care: A simple and effective tool for counselor educators and counseling students. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 13(1), 121-133.
46. Nethsinghe, R., Joseph, D., Mellizo, J., & Cabedo-Mas, A. (2023). Teaching songs from diverse cultures to pre-service teachers
47. using a “Four Step Flipped” method. International Journal of Music Education, 41(3), 383-397.
48. Nores, M., Friedman-Krauss, A., & Figueras-Daniel, A. (2022). Activity settings, content, and pedagogical strategies in preschool classrooms: Do these influence the interactions we observe? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 58, 264-277.
49. Öğülmüş, K., & Açıkgöz, M. H. (2024). Improving persuasive writing skills of high school students with specific learning disabilities: STOP and DARE strategy. Dyslexia, 30(4), e1788.
50. Ólafsdóttir, S. M., & Einarsdóttir, J. (2021). Peer culture in an Icelandic preschool and the engagement of children with diverse cultural backgrounds. International Journal of Early Childhood, 53, 49-64.
51. Perez, A., Green, J., Moharrami, M., Gianoni-Capenakas, S., Kebbe, M., Ganatra, S., . . . Sharmin, N. (2023). Active learning in undergraduate classroom dental education-a scoping review. Plos One, 18(10), e0293206.
52. Pilotti, D. M., Harbour, K. E., Miller, B. T., & Larkin, E. K. (2023). Creating cohesion and collaboration in mathematics classrooms: Implementing interdepartmental professional learning communities to support students with disabilities. Education Sciences, 14(1), 50.
53. Prasath, P. R., Chandrika Prasanna Kumaran, A., Spears, J. R., & Jackson, K. (2023). Creativity in the classroom: A content analysis of the Journal of Creativity in Mental Health from 2005 to 2020. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 18(3), 402-423.
54. Protacio, S., Piazza, S. V., David, V., & Tigchelaar, M. (2020). Elementary teachers’ initiatives in engaging families of English learners. School Community Journal, 30(2), 211-227.
55. Raza, A., Matloob, S., Abdul Rahim, N. F., Abdul Halim, H., Khattak, A., Ahmed, N. H., . . . Zubair, M. (2020). Factors impeding health-care professionals to effectively treat coronavirus disease 2019 patients in Pakistan: A qualitative investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 572450.
56. Raza, M. H. (2020). Codebook for qualitative data management and analysis. Springfield: Missouri State University.
57. Remler, D. K., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2022). Research methods in practice: Strategies for description and causation (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
58. Rodgers, D., & Alice, Y. (2023). Communication and collaboration: The paradox of the new competency-based curriculum in Kenya. American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 8(2), 199-212.
59. Rosiek, M. A., Etnier, J. L., & Willoughby, M. T. (2022). A comparison of the effects of outdoor physical activity and indoor classroom-based activities on measures of executive function in preschoolers. International Journal of Early Childhood, 54(2), 203-215.
60. Santiago-Rosario, M. R., McIntosh, K., & Whitcomb, S. A. (2023). Examining teachers’ culturally responsive classroom
61. management self-efficacy. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 48(3), 170-176.
62. Sari, H., Çevik, M., & Çevik, Ö. (2024). The impact of STEAM (STEM+ arts) activities on learning outcomes in students with specific learning disabilities. Support for Learning, 39(1), 3-21.
63. Sarkar, N., Ford, W., & Manzo, C. (2020). To flip or not to flip: What the evidence suggests. Journal of Education for Business, 95(2), 81-87.
64. Scott, J. C., Wilson, C. B., Greene, K. H., & Jeter, N. S. (2024). Implementing learner-centered teaching strategies in family science. Family Science Review, 28(1), n1.
65. Singh, A. B., & Engeness, I. (2021). Examining instructors’ roles in facilitating students’ learning process in pedagogical
66. information and communication technology massive open online course. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 17(2), 76–89.
67. Smith, J. D., & Hamon, R. L. (2022). Teaching theory: A multilevel framework for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Research and Theory, 48(2), 135-152.
68. Sun, J. C.-Y., & Lin, H.-S. (2022). Effects of integrating an interactive response system into flipped classroom instruction on students’ anti-phishing self-efficacy, collective efficacy, and sequential behavioral patterns. Computers & Education, 180, 104430.
69. Syatriana, E., Tohirovna, A. L., Shaxnoza, M., Malika, P., & Mardonovna, S. N. (2023). Exploring the experiential learning cycle application: Case study of University of Makassar and Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Language. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 296-305.
70. Thomas-Jackson, S. C., Zvonkovic, A., Reifman, A., Tanner, M., & Swenson, A. (2024). Two for the price of one: A work-family activity that enhances graduate-student teachers’ and undergraduate recipients’ learning. Family Science Review, 28(3).
71. Tutal, Ö., & Yazar, T. (2021). Flipped classroom improves academic achievement, learning retention and attitude towards course: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(4), 655-673.
72. Van Ryzin, M. J., Murray, C., & Roseth, C. J. (2024). The effects of cooperative learning on self-reported peer relations, peer support, and classroom engagement among students with disabilities. The Journal of Educational Research, 117(6), 355- 364.
73. Wallin, S., Hemmingsson, H., Thunberg, G., & Wilder, J. (2024). Turn-taking and communication modes of students and staff in group activities at non-inclusive schools for students with intellectual disability. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 40(1), 19-30.
74. Watts, G. W., Davis, M. T., & López, E. J. (2024). ‘How are you doing?’: college instructors’ relationships and communication
75. with students with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 70(7), 1274-1284.
76. White, C. M., Jacobs, R. A., & Miller, S. J. (2019). The function of teaching theory in modern classrooms: Exploring multilevel learning approaches. International Journal of Education and Teaching Theory, 14(1), 23-38.
77. Wu, Z., Yang, D., & Tinmaz, H. (2024). Chinese kindergarten teachers’ opinions on advanced technology use. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 38(2), 279-294.
78. Xie Fai Mar, F., Koh, K. T., & R. Falcão, W. (2023). Strategies and methods for teaching values transference from physical education to the classroom and home: A case study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(2), 479-496.
79. Xin, W., Liu, C., Zhang, Z., & Yao, X. (2024). A person-centred examination of inclusive teachers’ beliefs about teaching students with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Profiles and relations to teacher efficacy. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 70(8), 1507-1519.
80. Yi, H., Liu, T., & Lan, G. (2024). The key artificial intelligence technologies in early childhood education: A review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(1), 12.
81. Zhang, L., Carter Jr, R. A., Bernacki, M. L., & Greene, J. A. (2024). Personalization, individualization, and differentiation: What do they mean and how do they differ for students with disabilities? Exceptionality, 1-22.
