APPLICATION OF HEURISTIC LEARNING IN TEACHING PHYSICAL PROCESSES

Authors

  • Toshev Salimjon Nurboboyevich Trainee teacher of the Department of "Natural Sciences" Shahrisabz State Pedagogical Institute, Shahrisabz, Republic of Uzbekistan; [email protected] Author

Keywords:

heuristic learning, physics education, physical processes, inquiry-based learning, problem-solving skills.

Abstract

In recent years, learner-centered educational approaches have gained increasing attention in science education. Among them, heuristic learning plays a crucial role in developing students’ independent thinking and problem-solving skills. Physics, as an experimental and conceptually complex discipline, requires instructional methods that actively engage learners in the process of knowledge construction. This article explores the application of heuristic learning in teaching physical processes and evaluates its pedagogical effectiveness. The study is based on a quasi-experimental research design involving secondary school students. Heuristic learning strategies such as problem-based tasks, guided inquiry, experimental observation, and reflective questioning were implemented in the experimental group, while traditional lecture-based instruction was used in the control group. Data were collected through pre-tests, post-tests, classroom observations, and practical assignments. The results indicate that heuristic learning significantly improves students’ conceptual understanding of physical processes, analytical reasoning, and ability to apply theoretical knowledge in practical situations. The findings suggest that integrating heuristic learning into physics education enhances learning outcomes and promotes deeper scientific understanding.                                                                           

References

1. Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.

2. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.

3. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.

4. Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718.

5. Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.

6. Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138.

7. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Published

2026-01-16