KHIVA AT THE EDGE: ADAPTIVE STRATEGIES AND RUSSIAN ENCOUNTERS, 1806–1825

Authors

  • Saparbaev Bunyod Khurrambek ogli Doctor of philosophy (PhD) in Historical sciences, Docent Associate Professor of the Department of “History” of the Urgench State University named after Abu Rayhan Biruni, Uzbekistan E-mail: [email protected] Author

Keywords:

Khivan Khanate; Russian Empire; Muhammad Rahim Khan I; diplomacy; Central Asian frontier; negotiated sovereignty

Abstract

This article examines the multifaceted interactions between the Khivan Khanate and the Russian Empire during the reign of Muhammad Rahim Khan I (1806–1825). Through an integrative analysis of Persian, Chagatai and Russian diplomatic correspondence, frontier administrative records, and manuscript evidence from Central Asian and Eastern European archives, this study argues that Khiva’s diplomatic praxis was neither passive nor reactionary but rather a calibrated strategy of negotiated sovereignty. Investigating the institutionalization of diplomacy, economic negotiations, and frontier governance mechanisms, the article demonstrates how Khiva managed asymmetrical power relations through adaptive engagement. These findings recalibrate conventional imperial narratives and foreground Khivan agency within the broader dynamics of 19th-century Eurasian politics. This article examines the multifaceted interactions between the Khivan Khanate and the Russian Empire during the reign of Muhammad Rahim Khan I (1806–1825). Through an integrative analysis of Persian, Chagatai, and Russian diplomatic correspondence, frontier administrative records, and manuscript evidence from Central Asian and Eastern European archives, this study argues that Khiva’s diplomatic praxis was neither passive nor reactionary but rather a calibrated strategy of negotiated sovereignty. In addition to institutional and procedural innovations, the study highlights the role of individual agency, showing how Muhammad Rahim Khan I personally shaped envoy selection, linguistic framing, and the timing of negotiations to maximize strategic leverage. By examining temporal management, ritualized communication, and archival preservation as instruments of statecraft, the article reveals a nuanced form of frontier diplomacy where Khiva actively molded its engagements with a more powerful empire. These findings recalibrate conventional imperial narratives, foreground Khivan agency, and demonstrate that the Khanate’s strategic choices were grounded in both immediate political concerns and a long-term vision for sustaining autonomy in 19th-century Eurasian politics.

References

1. Khalid, Adeeb. Central Asia: A New History from the Imperial Conquests to the Present. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021, 54–58.

2. Becker, Sebastian. Russia’s Central Asian Frontier: Diplomacy and Expansion, 1800–1850. London: Routledge, 2004, 201–209.

3. Khodarkovsky, Michael. Russia’s Steppe Frontier: The Making of a Colonial Empire, 1500–1800. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2002, 287–292.

4. Sartori, Paolo. Visions of Justice: Sharīʿa and Cultural Change in Russian Central Asia. Leiden: Brill, 2016, 41–45.

5. Institute of Oriental Manuscripts, Russian Academy of Sciences (IOM RAS), Ms. D 410, fols. 23b–26a.

6. Russian State Historical Archive (RGIA), f. 1268, op. 1, d. 44, ll. 12–18.

7. Morrison, Alexander. “Empire, Mission, and Modernity in Central Asia.” Past & Present 224, no. 1 (2014): 214–218.

8. Anonymous. Majmuʿa-yi Mukātabāt-i Khiva, early 19th century manuscript, IOM RAS.

9. Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA), HAT 1234/56789.

10. Levi, Scott C. The Bukharan Crisis. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2020, 112–118.

11. Institute of Oriental Manuscripts of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IOM RAS), Ms. C 245, fols. 14a–18b.

12. Green, Nile. Persianate Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2019, 89–93.

13. Russian State Historical Archive (RGIA), f. 1268, op. 1, d. 52, ll. 3–7.

14. Morrison, Alexander. Russian Rule in Samarkand. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 41–45.

15. Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts (RGADA), f. 248, op. 3, d. 117, ll. 21–24.

16. Kappeler, Andreas. The Russian Empire. London: Routledge, 2014, 156–159.

17. IOM RAS, Ms. D 410.

18. Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA), HAT 1345/67890.

19. National Library of Uzbekistan, Khiva Collection, Ms. 112.

20. Russian Museum of Ethnography, Archive 1/1842.

21. Levi, Scott C. The Indian Diaspora in Central Asia. Leiden: Brill, 2002, 201–204.

22. RGIA, f. 1291, op. 84, d. 9.

23. Becker, S. Russia’s Central Asian Frontier, 221–224.

24. Benton, Lauren. A Search for Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, 2–7.

25. Sartori, Giovanni. Visions of Justice, 52–55.

26. Morrison, Alexander. “Empire and Frontier Governance.” Past & Present 224 (2014).

27. Munis, and Agahi. Firdaws al-Iqbal, ed. Bartold.

28. IOM RAS, Ms. B 98.

29. RGIA, f. 1268, op. 2, d. 61.

30. Becker, S. Russia’s Central Asian Frontier, 233.

31. Levi, Scott C. The Bukharan Crisis. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2020, 119–123.

32. RGADA, f. 248, op. 1, d. 91.

33. Morrison, Alexander. Russian Rule in Samarkand. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 67–70.

34. Green, Nile. Persianate Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2019, 141–145.

35. Institute of Oriental Manuscripts of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IOM RAS), Ms. D 512, fols. 7a–10b.

36. Russian State Historical Archive (RGIA), f. 1268, op. 2, d. 74, ll. 5–11.

37. Levi, Scott C. The Bukharan Crisis. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2020, 88–94.

38. National Library of Uzbekistan, Khiva Collection, Ms. 147, fols. 22a–24b.

39. Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts (RGADA), f. 248, op. 3, d. 139, ll. 18–21.

40. Martin, Virginia. Law and Custom in the Steppe. London: Routledge, 2001, 112–118.

41. IOM RAS, Ms. C 311, fols. 9a–12a.

42. RGIA, f. 1291, op. 84, d. 17, ll. 3–6.

43. Amanat, Abbas. Iran: A Modern History. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017, 203–207.

44. Majlis Library (Tehran), Ms. 9054, fols. 31b–33a.

45. RGIA, f. 1268, op. 1, d. 63, ll. 14–19.

46. Levi, Scott C. Caravans. Leiden: Brill, 2015, 144–149.

47. RGADA, f. 248, op. 1, d. 102, ll. 27–30.

48. Benton, Lauren. A Search for Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, 87–92.

49. IOM RAS, Ms. B 176, fols. 5b–7a.

50. RGIA, f. 1268, op. 2, d. 81, ll. 1–4.

51. Morrison, Alexander. Russian Rule in Samarkand. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 59–63.

52. Green, Nile. Persianate Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2019, 162–168.

53. Institute of Oriental Manuscripts of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IOM RAS), Ms. D 589, fols. 3b–6a.

54. Russian State Historical Archive (RGIA), f. 1268, op. 1, d. 91, ll. 12–17.

55. Russian State Military Historical Archive (RGVIA), f. 400, op. 1, d. 2876, ll. 4–9.

56. National Library of Uzbekistan, Khiva Collection, Ms. 203, fols. 18a–20b.

57. IOM RAS, Ms. C 418, fols. 7a–9b.

58. RGIA, f. 1291, op. 84, d. 26, ll. 10–14.

59. IOM RAS, Ms. B 244, fols. 11a–12b.

60. Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts (RGADA), f. 248, op. 2, d. 176, ll. 21–25.

61. IOM RAS, Ms. D 601, fols. 14a–16a.

62. RGVIA, f. 400, op. 1, d. 2912, ll. 7–11.

63. RGIA, f. 1268, op. 2, d. 104, ll. 3–8.

64. IOM RAS, Ms. C 377, fols. 2b–4a.

65. RGIA, f. 1268, op. 1, d. 88, ll. 19–23.

66. IOM RAS, Ms. B 301, fols. 5a–6b.

67. RGADA, f. 248, op. 1, d. 189, ll. 28–32.

68. RGIA, f. 1268, op. 2, d. 119, ll. 14–18.

69. IOM RAS, Ms. D 632, fols. 9b–11a.

70. Morrison, Alexander. The Russian Conquest of Central Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, 94–99.

71. Benton, Lauren, and Adam Clulow. Empires and the Reach of the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019, 131–137.

72. Green, Nile. Global Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020, 212–217.

Published

2026-02-09