AI AND TRADE SECRETS: PROTECTING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION IN THE ERA OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOGIES
Keywords:
Trade secrets; artificial intelligence; Defend Trade Secrets Act; confidential information; machine learning; data privacy; intellectual property; misappropriation; generative AI; corporate governance; EU Trade Secrets Directive; technology lawAbstract
The collision between artificial intelligence and trade secret law is not a future problem. It is happening now, in boardrooms, courtrooms, and the daily workflows of engineers who paste proprietary code into chatbots without a second thought. This article argues that existing legal frameworks, while structurally sound, are straining under pressures their drafters could not have anticipated. Drawing on the Defend Trade Secrets Act, the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, and the EU Trade Secrets Directive, the analysis maps where doctrine holds, where it bends, and where it is starting to break. Landmark cases are examined alongside regulatory developments and the emerging forensic challenges that make AI-related misappropriation claims uniquely difficult to prove. The article concludes with practical guidance for counsel navigating this terrain today, not waiting for the law to catch up.
References
1. Pooley, J. (2022). Trade Secrets: The Use of Confidential Business Information and Know-How in Commerce (2nd ed.). Law Journal Press.
2. Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2017). Counterfactual Explanations Without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 31(2), 841–887.
3. Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016, Pub. L. No. 114-153, 130 Stat. 376 (codified at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1836–1839).
4. 18 U.S.C. § 1839(3) (2016).
5. 18 U.S.C. § 1836(b)(2) (2016) (providing for ex parte civil seizure in extraordinary circumstances).
6. National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. (1985). Uniform Trade Secrets Act with 1985 Amendments. Retrieved from https://www.uniformlaws.org
7. Uniform Trade Secrets Act § 1(2) (1985).
8. Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights art. 39, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, 1869 U.N.T.S. 299.
9. Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on the Protection of Undisclosed Know-How and Business Information (Trade Secrets) Against Their Unlawful Acquisition, Use and Disclosure, 2016 O.J. (L 157) 1.
10. Carlini, N., Tramer, F., Wallace, E., Jagielski, M., Herbert-Voss, A., Lee, K., Roberts, A., Brown, T., Song, D., Erlingsson, U., Oprea, A., & Raffel, C. (2021). Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models. In 30th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 21), 2633–2650.
11. Nasr, M., Carlini, N., Hayase, J., Jagielski, M., Cooper, A. F., Ippolito, D., Choquette-Choo, C. A., Wallace, E., Tramer, F., & Lee, K. (2023). Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17035.
12. Goldman, E., & Rauterberg, G. (2023). Generative AI and the Law: A Practitioner's Guide. Stanford Technology Law Review, 26(1), 1–68.
13. Samsung Bans ChatGPT Use Among Staff After Sensitive Data Leak. (2023, May 2). Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/technology/samsung-bans-use-generative-ai-tools-like-chatgpt-staff-after-sensitive-data-2023-05-02/
14. Samuelson, P. (2023). How Generative AI Systems like ChatGPT Are Built on Intellectual Property. Communications of the ACM, 66(9), 20–22.
15. Grimmelmann, J. (2023). Who Are the AI Owners? Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 25, 1–55.
16. Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA (N.D. Cal. 2018). See also Levine, J. (2020). The Trade Secret of Self-Driving Cars. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 35(2), 649–712.
17. See, e.g., Doe 1 v. GitHub, Inc., No. 4:22-cv-06823-JST (N.D. Cal. 2023). See also Dobkin, J. (2023). Misappropriation in the Age of Machine Learning. Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, 24(1), 112–165.
18. Federal Trade Commission. (2023). Generative AI Raises Competition Concerns. FTC Business Blog. https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2023/06/generative-ai-raises-competition-concerns
19. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2023). Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure, Release No. 33-11216, 88 Fed. Reg. 51,896 (Aug. 4, 2023).
20. Sanger, C., & Lobel, O. (2023). AI Governance in the Workplace: Legal Frameworks for Employee Data and Confidentiality. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor and Employment Law, 25(3), 301–354.
21. Stone, J., & Lee, A. (2023). Drafting Enforceable AI Confidentiality Provisions in Employment Contracts. Practical Law Company, Thomson Reuters.
22. Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016). Deep Learning with Differential Privacy. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 308–318.
